Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W220
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 30-120mm (F2.8-7.1) lens
- 147g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
Photography Glossary Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W220 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony W220, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the W220 (12MP) is fairly close and both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe XZ-10 was manufactured 4 years later than the W220 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the XZ-10 grades against the W220 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W220 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Sony W220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Sony W220
| XZ-10 | W220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 50 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W220 over the Olympus XZ-10
| W220 | XZ-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony W220
| XZ-10 | W220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W220 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-10 enjoys external dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Sony W220 has dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony W220 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the XZ-10 compared to the W220.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-10 and W220 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W220 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizing merely by researching a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-10 and W220.
As you can see, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size and the identical megapixels and you can expect comparable quality of files however you will need to take the age of the cameras into account. The fresher XZ-10 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W220 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W220 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-01-30 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 30-120mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/2.8-7.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 1 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 7.10 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Flash On, Slow Syncro, Red-eye, Flash Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (8 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221g (0.49 lbs) | 147g (0.32 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $428 | $160 |