Clicky

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W320

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
57
Overall
44
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front
Portability
97
Imaging
36
Features
21
Overall
30

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W320 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
  • 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Sony W320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
  • Revealed January 2010
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W320 Overview

Here is a extensive review of the Olympus XZ-10 versus Sony W320, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the W320 (14MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The XZ-10 was unveiled 3 years later than the W320 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the XZ-10 scores against the W320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Sony W320

 XZ-10 W320 
RevealedJanuary 2013January 2010Fresher by 38 months
Manual focus More exact focus
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Olympus XZ-10

 W320 XZ-10 

Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony W320

 XZ-10 W320 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-10 features outside measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Sony W320 has proportions of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") and a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus XZ-10 versus Sony W320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the XZ-10 compared to the W320.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W320 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-10 and W320 is 91 and 97 respectively.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing purely by seeing technical specs. The graphic here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-10 and W320.

As you can tell, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Sony W320 to show greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The fresher XZ-10 should have a benefit in sensor tech.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Portrait photography details
Sony W320 Portrait photography details
45
you can focus manually
offers face detect focusing
supports RAW files
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
28
decent megapixels (14MP)
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus XZ-10
Street photography with Sony W320
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
heavier than others in class (221g)
48
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus XZ-10
Sports photography with Sony W320
34
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (5.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
26
decent megapixels (14MP)
max fps very slow (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 as a Travel photography camera
Sony W320 as a Travel photography camera
60
built-in flash
fairly wide (26mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
lack of Time Lapse mode
heavier than others in class (221g)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
66
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (26mm)
no Time Lapse function
does not contain selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Landscape photography advice
Sony W320 Landscape photography advice
53
you can focus manually
fairly wide (26mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of Time Lapse mode
33
reasonably wide (26mm)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual mode not possible
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
no Time Lapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Vlogging advice
Sony W320 Vlogging advice
35
fairly wide (26mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of mic port
heavier than others in class (221 grams)
26
reasonably wide (26mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
no external mic jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-10 and Sony W320
 Olympus Stylus XZ-10Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model Olympus Stylus XZ-10 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
Class Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Revealed 2013-01-30 2010-01-07
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3968 x 2976 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 35 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) 26-105mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture f/1.8-2.7 f/2.7-5.7
Macro focus range 1cm 4cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 920k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 30 seconds 1 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 5.0 frames per second 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 4.80 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 221g (0.49 pounds) 117g (0.26 pounds)
Physical dimensions 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 240 images -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model Li-50B NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at release $428 $269