Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W690
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82a12/82a1263e2fcea5ac4d6bef1198741cbea2097fd0" alt="Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8372c/8372c357a2e4c2fb53bb60890865fd6d1bc60793" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690 front"
95 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W690 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 142g - 94 x 56 x 22mm
- Released February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W690 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony W690, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and W690 (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The XZ-10 was revealed 12 months later than the W690 so they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a short highlight of how the XZ-10 scores vs the W690 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W690 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery and Sony W690 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Sony W690
XZ-10 | W690 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | February 2012 | More recent by 12 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W690 over the Olympus XZ-10
W690 | XZ-10 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony W690
XZ-10 | W690 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W690 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-10 enjoys outside measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Sony W690 has specifications of 94mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony W690 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the XZ-10 against the W690.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d361d/d361dff3cfc81c942a5371ed023aa6c6e7f89cb0" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W690 size comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W690 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-10 and W690 is 91 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c67b4/c67b4c4013bb02da4f582324fdefe73805f5ba3a" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W690 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W690 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W690 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements only by checking a spec sheet. The photograph below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-10 and W690.
Clearly, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Sony W690 to give you extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots more aggressively. The more modern XZ-10 provides an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7130a/7130a93425e811820a8b793b019e1323a801be56" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W690 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W690 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W690 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bafb6/bafb6b094817ec8a4b29a9478dfb70cf13a3cfb7" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W690 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W690 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony W690 Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2013-01-30 | 2012-02-28 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | ClearPhoto TFT LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) | 142 grams (0.31 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 94 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photos | 220 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $428 | $297 |