Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony WX300
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Portability
94 Imaging
42 Features
38 Overall
40
94 Imaging
42 Features
38 Overall
40
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony WX300 Key Specs
Olympus XZ-10
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Introduced January 2013
Sony WX300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 166g - 96 x 55 x 25mm
- Announced February 2013
- Replacement is Sony WX350
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony WX300 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony WX300, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and WX300 (18MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe XZ-10 was announced within a month of the WX300 which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a concise view of how the XZ-10 scores vs the WX300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony WX300 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Sony WX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Sony WX300
| XZ-10 | WX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony WX300 over the Olympus XZ-10
| WX300 | XZ-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony WX300
| XZ-10 | WX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | February 2013 | Same age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony WX300 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-10 provides physical measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Sony WX300 has measurements of 96mm x 55mm x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 166 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony WX300 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the XZ-10 versus the WX300.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-10 and WX300 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony WX300 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes just by going through specifications. The image below should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-10 and WX300.
Plainly, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Sony WX300 to produce extra detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a little more aggressively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony WX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus XZ-10 Portrait photography details
Sony WX300 Portrait photography details
you can focus manually
offers face detect focus
delivers RAW files
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
megapixel count decent (18MP)
comes with face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Olympus XZ-10 as a Street photography camera
Sony WX300 as a Street photography camera
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition in class (221 grams)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (166g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Olympus XZ-10 Sports photography advice
Sony WX300 Sports photography advice
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking focus
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
excellent zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (18MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Olympus XZ-10 as a Travel photography camera
Sony WX300 as a Travel photography camera
built-in flash
rather wide (26mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition in class (221 grams)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
lighter than competitors (166 grams)
megapixel count decent (18MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
long reach (500mm)
no Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Olympus XZ-10 Landscape photography features
Sony WX300 Landscape photography features
you can focus manually
rather wide (26mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have Timelapse recording
reasonably wide (25mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (18 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not available
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
no Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-10 Vlogging information
Sony WX300 Vlogging information
rather wide (26mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
does not have microphone socket
more heavy than competition in class (221g)
reasonably wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors (166g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
no external mic support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony WX300 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-01-30 | 2013-02-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/3.5-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 221 gr (0.49 lbs) | 166 gr (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 96 x 55 x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $428 | $330 |