Olympus TG-310 vs Olympus XZ-1
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Portability
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus TG-310 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2011
Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-310 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Olympus TG-310 and Olympus XZ-1, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both created by Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the TG-310 (14MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the TG-310 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") use totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-310 was introduced around the same time to the XZ-1 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the TG-310 grades vs the XZ-1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-310 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-310 & Olympus XZ-1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-310 Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus XZ-1
| TG-310 | XZ-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus TG-310
| XZ-1 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Olympus XZ-1
| TG-310 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 |  | January 2011 | Same age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-310 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and size. The Olympus TG-310 provides outer measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-1 has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-310 and Olympus XZ-1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-310 vs the XZ-1.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-310 and XZ-1 is 94 and 88 respectively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements only by researching specs. The photograph here might give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-310 and XZ-1.
All in all, both cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The TG-310 using its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Olympus TG-310 will provide you with more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-310 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus XZ-1 as a Portrait photography camera
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
supports face detection autofocus
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
has manual focus
includes face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.63")
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Street photography with Olympus TG-310
Street photography with Olympus XZ-1
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
lighter than others in class (155g)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/1.63")
more heavy than competition in class (275g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Olympus TG-310 Sports photography details
Olympus XZ-1 Sports photography details
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14MP)
supports tracking autofocus
environment sealing
slow fps (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery (150 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes tracking autofocus
great battery pack (320 per charge)
slow fps (2.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.63")
has no phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-310 Travel photography features
Olympus XZ-1 Travel photography features
lighter than others in class (155 grams)
environment sealing
good megapixels (14MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
terrible battery (150 CIPA)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
great battery pack (320 shots)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition in class (275 grams)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-310 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus XZ-1 as a Landscape photography camera
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
environment sealing
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual exposure not available
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
terrible battery (150 per charge)
does not have Time Lapse function
has manual focus
pretty wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
great battery pack (320 per charge)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.63")
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus TG-310
Vlogging with Olympus XZ-1
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection autofocus
lighter than others in class (155 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic jack
pretty wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection autofocus
does not offer selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone support
more heavy than competition in class (275g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-310 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Olympus TG-310 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus TG-310 | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-01-06 | 2011-01-26 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 pounds) | 275g (0.61 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 photos | 320 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $0 | $567 |