Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic ZS200
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Additionally Known as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS100
Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus TG-310 versus Panasonic ZS200, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-310 (14MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the TG-310 (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") feature different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-310 was brought out 8 years prior to the ZS200 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple overview of how the TG-310 scores versus the ZS200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-310 and Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-310 Gallery and Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Panasonic ZS200
TG-310 | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus TG-310
ZS200 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2018 | January 2011 | More recent by 86 months | |
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 230k | Clearer screen (+1010k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Panasonic ZS200
TG-310 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-310 has got outer measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS200 has sizing of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") with a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-310 versus Panasonic ZS200 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-310 against the ZS200.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-310 and ZS200 is 94 and 86 respectively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-310 and ZS200.
Clearly, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The TG-310 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh tougher and the Panasonic ZS200 will offer you greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older TG-310 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus TG-310 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus TG-310 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2011-01-06 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,240 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.20 m | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155g (0.34 lb) | 340g (0.75 lb) |
Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 shots | 370 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $0 | $800 |