Clicky

Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic ZS200

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
33
Overall
35
Olympus TG-310 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front
Portability
86
Imaging
54
Features
66
Overall
58

Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs

Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Announced January 2011
Panasonic ZS200
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
  • 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
  • Revealed February 2018
  • Additionally Known as Lumix DC-TZ200
  • Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS100
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview

Let's look much closer at the Olympus TG-310 versus Panasonic ZS200, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-310 (14MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the TG-310 (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") feature different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The TG-310 was brought out 8 years prior to the ZS200 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple overview of how the TG-310 scores versus the ZS200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Panasonic ZS200

 TG-310 ZS200 

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus TG-310

 ZS200 TG-310 
RevealedFebruary 2018January 2011More recent by 86 months
Manual focus Very precise focusing
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1240k230kClearer screen (+1010k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Panasonic ZS200

 TG-310 ZS200 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-310 has got outer measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS200 has sizing of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") with a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).

Check out the Olympus TG-310 versus Panasonic ZS200 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-310 against the ZS200.

Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-310 and ZS200 is 94 and 86 respectively.

Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-310 and ZS200.

Clearly, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The TG-310 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh tougher and the Panasonic ZS200 will offer you greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older TG-310 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-310 Portrait photography highlights
Panasonic ZS200 Portrait photography highlights
33
decent MP (14 megapixels)
has face detect focus
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
65
focusing manually
MP count decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (1")
features face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
can't use external flash
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-310 as a Street photography camera
Panasonic ZS200 as a Street photography camera
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
lighter than average (155 grams)
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
77
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor size (1")
delivers RAW files
has touch to focus
screen does not articulate
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-310 Sports photography information
Panasonic ZS200 Sports photography information
40
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
has tracking focus
weather sealing
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
bad battery power (150 shots)
does not have phase detect auto focus
70
incredible zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
silent mode (1/16,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (1")
features tracking focus
great battery life (370 per charge)
does not have phase detect AF
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus TG-310
Travel photography with Panasonic ZS200
67
lighter than average (155g)
weather sealing
decent MP (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse function
bad battery power (150 shots)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
76
great battery life (370 shots)
supports bluetooth
has touch to focus
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
long zoom (360mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-310 Landscape photography highlights
Panasonic ZS200 Landscape photography highlights
39
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
weather sealing
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
bad battery power (150 per charge)
missing Time Lapse function
70
focusing manually
rather wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (1")
delivers RAW files
great battery life (370 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-310 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic ZS200 as a Vlogging camera
32
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
lighter than average (155 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic jack
35
rather wide (24mm)
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focusing
video res high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing mic port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-310 and Panasonic ZS200
 Olympus TG-310Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus TG-310 Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200
Otherwise known as - Lumix DC-TZ200
Category Waterproof Large Sensor Compact
Announced 2011-01-06 2018-02-13
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III+ Venus Engine
Sensor type CCD MOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4288 x 3216 5472 x 3648
Maximum native ISO 1600 12800
Maximum enhanced ISO - 25600
Min native ISO 80 125
RAW files
Min enhanced ISO - 80
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 49
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-102mm (3.6x) 24-360mm (15.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.9-5.9 f/3.3-6.4
Macro focus range 3cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 2.7
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7" 3"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 1,240 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,330 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.53x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Fastest silent shutter speed - 1/16000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 1.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.20 m 6.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 3840x2160
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155g (0.34 lb) 340g (0.75 lb)
Dimensions 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 150 shots 370 shots
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-42B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible)
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $0 $800