Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FX75
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de436/de436c1d22864ee65c1aad5da965732699f4570f" alt="Olympus TG-310 front Olympus TG-310 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a220c/a220c2e13d4b7304cd494deb3786cbaa31bcfeb7" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FX70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Here is a complete assessment of the Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FX75, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the TG-310 (14MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The TG-310 was introduced 8 months later than the FX75 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the TG-310 grades against the FX75 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-310 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-310 Gallery and Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Panasonic FX75
TG-310 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2011 | ![]() | June 2010 | Fresher by 8 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus TG-310
FX75 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Panasonic FX75
TG-310 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Same screen measurements |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-310 provides external measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX75 has proportions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FX75 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-310 vs the FX75.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc506/cc506a5642ec4d8d94cf5cab0bf9ae4a9c8062d5" alt="Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-310 and FX75 is 94 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d4d0/8d4d0734837eebaa23d106c4561e82fe4e933652" alt="Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizing simply by checking out specifications. The graphic below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-310 and FX75.
To sum up, both cameras feature the identical sensor size and the exact same MP therefore you should expect comparable quality of files but you have to consider the release date of the cameras into account. The fresher TG-310 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba3aa/ba3aa3c1cd72fcb1ab06690d968ad04470361b1c" alt="Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/909eb/909eb7bcc4834aaab0de21804f2a45558cec0d5b" alt="Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
Olympus TG-310 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus TG-310 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2011-01-06 | 2010-06-01 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.2-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.20 m | 7.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 155 gr (0.34 pounds) | 165 gr (0.36 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $0 | $139 |