Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FZ2500
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35


53 Imaging
52 Features
81 Overall
63
Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Launched September 2016
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Succeeded the Panasonic FZ1000

Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
Here is a thorough analysis of the Olympus TG-310 and Panasonic FZ2500, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-310 (14MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the TG-310 (1/2.3") and FZ2500 (1") boast totally different sensor sizes.

The TG-310 was unveiled 6 years earlier than the FZ2500 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summary of how the TG-310 scores against the FZ2500 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-310 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-310 Gallery and Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Panasonic FZ2500
TG-310 | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus TG-310
FZ2500 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | ![]() | January 2011 | Fresher by 69 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Panasonic FZ2500
TG-310 | FZ2500 |
---|
Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-310 has external measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ2500 has measurements of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") along with a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-310 and Panasonic FZ2500 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-310 versus the FZ2500.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-310 and FZ2500 is 94 and 53 respectively.

Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to see the contrast in sensor sizing simply by researching technical specs. The visual underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-310 and FZ2500.
As you can tell, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The TG-310 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Panasonic FZ2500 will render more detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older TG-310 will be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus TG-310 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus TG-310 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2011-01-06 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.20 m | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155g (0.34 pounds) | 915g (2.02 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 shots | 350 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $0 | $998 |