Clicky

Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FZ2500

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
33
Overall
35
Olympus TG-310 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 front
Portability
53
Imaging
52
Features
81
Overall
63

Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs

Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Released January 2011
Panasonic FZ2500
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
  • Launched September 2016
  • Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FZ2000
  • Succeeded the Panasonic FZ1000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview

Here is a thorough analysis of the Olympus TG-310 and Panasonic FZ2500, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-310 (14MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the TG-310 (1/2.3") and FZ2500 (1") boast totally different sensor sizes.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The TG-310 was unveiled 6 years earlier than the FZ2500 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summary of how the TG-310 scores against the FZ2500 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Panasonic FZ2500

 TG-310 FZ2500 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus TG-310

 FZ2500 TG-310 
LaunchedSeptember 2016January 2011Fresher by 69 months
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1040k230kCrisper screen (+810k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Panasonic FZ2500

 TG-310 FZ2500 

Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-310 has external measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ2500 has measurements of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") along with a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).

Examine the Olympus TG-310 and Panasonic FZ2500 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-310 versus the FZ2500.

Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FZ2500 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-310 and FZ2500 is 94 and 53 respectively.

Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FZ2500 top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's hard to see the contrast in sensor sizing simply by researching technical specs. The visual underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-310 and FZ2500.

As you can tell, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The TG-310 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Panasonic FZ2500 will render more detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older TG-310 will be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FZ2500 sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-310 Portrait photography info
Panasonic FZ2500 Portrait photography info
33
decent MP (14MP)
provides face detection autofocus
no manual focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
71
focusing manually
good resolution (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (1")
features face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus TG-310
Street photography with Panasonic FZ2500
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
lighter than competition in class (155g)
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
70
screen articulates fully
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor size (1")
delivers RAW files
supports touch focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-310 Sports photography details
Panasonic FZ2500 Sports photography details
40
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
environment sealing
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
low battery power (150 CIPA)
does not have phase detect autofocus
68
great zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
quiet mode (1/16,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (1")
features tracking focus
doesn't have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-310 Travel photography information
Panasonic FZ2500 Travel photography information
67
lighter than competition in class (155g)
environment sealing
decent MP (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
low battery power (150 shots)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
65
supports touch focus
good resolution (20MP)
built-in flash
selfie friendly screen
decently wide (24mm)
long zoom (480mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus TG-310
Landscape photography with Panasonic FZ2500
39
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
environment sealing
no manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no manual exposure
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
low battery power (150 shots)
does not have Timelapse mode
64
focusing manually
decently wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (1")
delivers RAW files
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-310 Vlogging details
Panasonic FZ2500 Vlogging details
32
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection autofocus
lighter than competition in class (155g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external microphone port
66
decently wide (24mm)
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focusing
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pixels)
comes with mic socket
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Olympus TG-310 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-310 and Panasonic FZ2500
 Olympus TG-310Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus TG-310 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500
Also Known as - Lumix DMC-FZ2000
Type Waterproof Large Sensor Superzoom
Released 2011-01-06 2016-09-19
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III+ Venus Engine
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 1600 12800
Highest enhanced ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 80 125
RAW format
Lowest enhanced ISO - 80
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points - 49
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-102mm (3.6x) 24-480mm (20.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.9-5.9 f/2.8-4.5
Macro focus distance 3cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 2.7
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230k dots 1,040k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.74x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Fastest quiet shutter speed - 1/16000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 1.0fps 12.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.20 m 13.20 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 1280x720 4096x2160
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155g (0.34 pounds) 915g (2.02 pounds)
Physical dimensions 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 70
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.0
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.6
DXO Low light score not tested 538
Other
Battery life 150 shots 350 shots
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-42B DMW-BLC12
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Card slots 1 1
Price at release $0 $998