Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax Q-S1
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Revealed August 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus TG-310 versus Pentax Q-S1, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the TG-310 (14MP) and the Q-S1 (12MP) is very similar but the TG-310 (1/2.3") and Q-S1 (1/1.7") come with different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-310 was unveiled 4 years before the Q-S1 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the TG-310 scores versus the Q-S1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-310 & Pentax Q-S1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-310 Gallery & Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Pentax Q-S1
| TG-310 | Q-S1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Olympus TG-310
| Q-S1 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2014 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 43 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Pentax Q-S1
| TG-310 | Q-S1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-310 comes with outside measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Pentax Q-S1 has proportions of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-310 versus Pentax Q-S1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the TG-310 vs the Q-S1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-310 and Q-S1 is 94 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading technical specs. The picture here will give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-310 and Q-S1.
As you have seen, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The TG-310 having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus TG-310 will offer you more detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged TG-310 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
| Olympus TG-310 | Pentax Q-S1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus TG-310 | Pentax Q-S1 |
| Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2011-01-06 | 2014-08-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | Q Engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 8 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) | 203 grams (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 shots | 250 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | D-LI68 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $250 |