Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax WG-10
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
![Olympus TG-310 front Olympus TG-310 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-TG-310/Olympus-TG-310-front.jpg)
![Pentax WG-10 front Pentax WG-10 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Pentax-WG-10/Pentax-WG-10-front.jpg)
93 Imaging
38 Features
34 Overall
36
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax WG-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2013
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax WG-10 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus TG-310 versus Pentax WG-10, both Waterproof digital cameras by companies Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the TG-310 (14MP) and the WG-10 (14MP) is pretty similar and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The TG-310 was revealed 3 years prior to the WG-10 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a short overview of how the TG-310 matches up vs the WG-10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax WG-10 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-310 & Pentax WG-10. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-310 Gallery & Pentax WG-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Pentax WG-10
TG-310 | WG-10 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-10 over the Olympus TG-310
WG-10 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2013 | ![]() | January 2011 | More recent by 29 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Pentax WG-10
TG-310 | WG-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equal screen size |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax WG-10 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-310 has outside measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Pentax WG-10 has dimensions of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-310 versus Pentax WG-10 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-310 vs the WG-10.
![Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax WG-10 size comparison Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax WG-10 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-TG-310-vs-Pentax-WG-10-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-310 and WG-10 is 94 and 93 respectively.
![Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax WG-10 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax WG-10 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-TG-310-vs-Pentax-WG-10-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax WG-10 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements only by reviewing specifications. The photograph underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-310 and WG-10.
Plainly, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same resolution so you can expect similar quality of files although you will want to take the launch date of the products into consideration. The older TG-310 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
![Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax WG-10 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax WG-10 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-TG-310-vs-Pentax-WG-10-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax WG-10 Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax WG-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax WG-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-TG-310-vs-Pentax-WG-10-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax WG-10 Specifications
Olympus TG-310 | Pentax WG-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus TG-310 | Pentax WG-10 |
Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Released | 2011-01-06 | 2013-06-21 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 0.7 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.20 m | 1.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lb) | 167 grams (0.37 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 pictures | 260 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $0 | $0 |