Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Key Specs
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2011
Pentax WG-3 GPS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched July 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Overview
Following is a in-depth overview of the Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS, both Waterproof digital cameras by companies Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the TG-310 (14MP) and the WG-3 GPS (16MP) is relatively similar and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-310 was launched 3 years prior to the WG-3 GPS which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summary of how the TG-310 matches up vs the WG-3 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-310 and Pentax WG-3 GPS. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-310 Gallery and Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| TG-310 | WG-3 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Olympus TG-310
| WG-3 GPS | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2013 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 30 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Pentax WG-3 GPS
| TG-310 | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-310 features outer measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-3 GPS has proportions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-310 vs the WG-3 GPS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-310 and WG-3 GPS is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading specifications. The image here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-310 and WG-3 GPS.
To sum up, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Pentax WG-3 GPS to offer greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged TG-310 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-310 Portrait photography features
Pentax WG-3 GPS Portrait photography features
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
supports face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
manual focus
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has face detection focusing
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-310 Street photography information
Pentax WG-3 GPS Street photography information
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
more heavy than competitors (238g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sports photography with Olympus TG-310
Sports photography with Pentax WG-3 GPS
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
supports tracking focus
weather proofing
low fps (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (150 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect AF
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
weather proof
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
bad battery life (240 per charge)
no phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-310 Travel photography information
Pentax WG-3 GPS Travel photography information
lighter than competition in class (155g)
weather proofing
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
not so great battery pack (150 shots)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
weather proof
decent MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
bad battery life (240 CIPA)
more heavy than competitors (238g)
screen is not selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-310
Landscape photography with Pentax WG-3 GPS
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
weather proofing
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
small screen (2.7")
manual mode not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
not so great battery pack (150 CIPA)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
manual focus
pretty wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
weather proof
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
bad battery life (240 CIPA)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus TG-310
Vlogging with Pentax WG-3 GPS
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focusing
lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have mic support
pretty wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of external microphone port
more heavy than competitors (238g)
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Specifications
| Olympus TG-310 | Pentax WG-3 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus TG-310 | Pentax WG-3 GPS |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2011-01-06 | 2013-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) | 238 gr (0.52 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 pictures | 240 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $0 | $350 |