Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax XG-1
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax XG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1248mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 567g - 119 x 89 x 98mm
- Introduced July 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax XG-1 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus TG-310 and Pentax XG-1, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the TG-310 (14MP) and the XG-1 (16MP) is relatively similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-310 was manufactured 4 years before the XG-1 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera and the Pentax XG-1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summation of how the TG-310 grades vs the XG-1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax XG-1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-310 and Pentax XG-1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-310 Gallery and Pentax XG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Pentax XG-1
| TG-310 | XG-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax XG-1 over the Olympus TG-310
| XG-1 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2014 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 42 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Pentax XG-1
| TG-310 | XG-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax XG-1 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-310 has got external dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Pentax XG-1 has sizing of 119mm x 89mm x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-310 and Pentax XG-1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-310 vs the XG-1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-310 and XG-1 is 94 and 66 respectively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax XG-1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing just by reviewing technical specs. The graphic below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-310 and XG-1.
As you can tell, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Pentax XG-1 to offer extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older TG-310 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax XG-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax XG-1 Specifications
| Olympus TG-310 | Pentax XG-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus TG-310 | Pentax XG-1 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-01-06 | 2014-07-15 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-1248mm (52.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dot |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 9.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | 6.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Force Off, Flash Auto, Force Flash, Slow Sync., Slow Sync. + Red-Eye, Red-Eye Reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 gr (0.34 pounds) | 567 gr (1.25 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 119 x 89 x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 images | 240 images |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | LB-060 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $0 | $599 |