Olympus TG-310 vs Ricoh CX3
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Portability
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus TG-310 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2011
Ricoh CX3
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced June 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-310 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Olympus TG-310 versus Ricoh CX3, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-310 (14MP) and CX3 (10MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-310 was brought out 7 months after the CX3 and they are of a similar age. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summation of how the TG-310 scores vs the CX3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-310 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-310 & Ricoh CX3. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-310 Gallery & Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Ricoh CX3
| TG-310 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Olympus TG-310
| CX3 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Ricoh CX3
| TG-310 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-310 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-310 comes with outer dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX3 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-310 versus Ricoh CX3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-310 vs the CX3.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-310 and CX3 is 94 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes just by researching specs. The picture below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-310 and CX3.
All in all, both cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-310 to result in extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The fresher TG-310 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-310 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-310 Portrait photography information
Ricoh CX3 Portrait photography information
good resolution (14MP)
includes face detect focus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
you can focus manually
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-310 Street photography features
Ricoh CX3 Street photography features
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
lighter than average (155 grams)
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (206 grams)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Olympus TG-310 Sports photography info
Ricoh CX3 Sports photography info
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14MP)
includes tracking focus
environment sealing
max frames per second very slow (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (150 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-310 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh CX3 as a Travel photography camera
lighter than average (155g)
environment sealing
good resolution (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
not so great battery pack (150 shots)
does not contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
lighter than average (206 grams)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
great reach (300mm)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-310
Landscape photography with Ricoh CX3
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
environment sealing
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
small screen (2.7 inch)
no manual control
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
not so great battery pack (150 shots)
does not have Time Lapse mode
you can focus manually
really wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not available
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-310 Vlogging factors
Ricoh CX3 Vlogging factors
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
lighter than average (155g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
does not contain selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have mic port
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (206 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external mic socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-310 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Olympus TG-310 | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus TG-310 | Ricoh CX3 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-01-06 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 lb) | 206g (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $0 | $329 |