Olympus TG-310 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus TG-310 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Released February 2015
- Earlier Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-6
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-310 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus TG-310 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS, both Waterproof digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the TG-310 (14MP) and the WG-5 GPS (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-310 was brought out 5 years before the WG-5 GPS and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the TG-310 scores against the WG-5 GPS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-310 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-310 & Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-310 Gallery & Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| TG-310 | WG-5 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Olympus TG-310
| WG-5 GPS | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2015 | January 2011 | More recent by 49 months | |
| Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| TG-310 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus TG-310 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-310 features outside measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has sizing of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-310 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-310 compared to the WG-5 GPS.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-310 and WG-5 GPS is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to envision the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading specifications. The visual here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-310 and WG-5 GPS.
Plainly, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to offer you greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The older TG-310 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-310 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-310 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
| Olympus TG-310 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus TG-310 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Released | 2011-01-06 | 2015-02-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 14.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 lb) | 236g (0.52 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 photos | 240 photos |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $0 | $500 |