Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung TL500
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Announced July 2010
- Alternate Name is EX1
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
Here is a detailed assessment of the Olympus TG-310 and Samsung TL500, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the TG-310 (14MP) and TL500 (10MP) and the TG-310 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") boast different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-310 was brought out 7 months later than the TL500 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the TG-310 scores against the TL500 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-310 and Samsung TL500. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-310 Gallery and Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Samsung TL500
| TG-310 | TL500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 | July 2010 | Fresher by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Olympus TG-310
| TL500 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 614k | 230k | Clearer screen (+384k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Samsung TL500
| TG-310 | TL500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-310 comes with outer measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung TL500 has dimensions of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-310 and Samsung TL500 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at that moment. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-310 versus the TL500.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-310 and TL500 is 94 and 88 respectively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing only by going over specs. The visual here might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-310 and TL500.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The TG-310 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Olympus TG-310 will offer you greater detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more modern TG-310 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
| Olympus TG-310 | Samsung TL500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus TG-310 | Samsung TL500 |
| Also called as | - | EX1 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-01-06 | 2010-07-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.8-2.4 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | 5.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) | 386 grams (0.85 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 40 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 129 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-42B | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $527 |