Olympus TG-310 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
82 Imaging
55 Features
30 Overall
45
Olympus TG-310 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
- Introduced February 2012
- Later Model is Sigma DP2 Merrill
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-310 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus TG-310 and Sigma DP1 Merrill, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the TG-310 (14MP) and the DP1 Merrill (15MP) is relatively similar but the TG-310 (1/2.3") and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) have totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-310 was introduced 13 months earlier than the DP1 Merrill which makes them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the TG-310 scores against the DP1 Merrill with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-310 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-310 and Sigma DP1 Merrill. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-310 Gallery and Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Sigma DP1 Merrill
| TG-310 | DP1 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" | " | Bigger screen (+2.7") |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Olympus TG-310
| DP1 Merrill | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 | January 2011 | More recent by 13 months | |
| Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Sigma DP1 Merrill
| TG-310 | DP1 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-310 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-310 enjoys external measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sigma DP1 Merrill has proportions of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") and a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-310 and Sigma DP1 Merrill in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-310 vs the DP1 Merrill.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-310 and DP1 Merrill is 94 and 82 respectively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading specs. The graphic underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-310 and DP1 Merrill.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The TG-310 using its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field trickier and the Sigma DP1 Merrill will offer more detail using its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The older TG-310 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-310 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus TG-310 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications
| Olympus TG-310 | Sigma DP1 Merrill | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model type | Olympus TG-310 | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
| Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-01-06 | 2012-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | Dual TRUE II engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 15MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4704 x 3136 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | () |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | - |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 pounds) | 330g (0.73 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $1,250 |