Olympus TG-310 vs Sigma SD9
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Olympus TG-310 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Announced November 2002
- Renewed by Sigma SD10
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-310 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
In this write-up, we are comparing the Olympus TG-310 vs Sigma SD9, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sigma. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the TG-310 (14MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the TG-310 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) feature different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-310 was unveiled 8 years later than the SD9 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the TG-310 grades vs the SD9 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-310 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-310 & Sigma SD9. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-310 Gallery & Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Sigma SD9
| TG-310 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | November 2002 | More recent by 99 months |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 130k | Clearer display (+100k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Olympus TG-310
| SD9 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Sigma SD9
| TG-310 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-310 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-310 features outer dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sigma SD9 has measurements of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") having a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-310 vs Sigma SD9 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-310 versus the SD9.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-310 and SD9 is 94 and 54 respectively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor measurements only by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph below will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-310 and SD9.
As you can see, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TG-310 using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Olympus TG-310 will deliver greater detail having an extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The newer TG-310 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-310 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus TG-310 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
| Olympus TG-310 | Sigma SD9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model type | Olympus TG-310 | Sigma SD9 |
| Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2011-01-06 | 2002-11-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 3 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 1.8 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 130 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) | 950 grams (2.09 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $3,001 |