Clicky

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A300

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
33
Overall
35
Olympus TG-310 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front
Portability
64
Imaging
49
Features
45
Overall
47

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A300 Key Specs

Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Released January 2011
Sony A300
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Revealed January 2008
  • New Model is Sony A330
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A300 Overview

On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A300, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the TG-310 (14MP) and A300 (10MP) and the TG-310 (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) boast different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The TG-310 was launched 2 years later than the A300 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the TG-310 grades vs the A300 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Sony A300

 TG-310 A300 
RevealedJanuary 2011January 2008More recent by 36 months

Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Olympus TG-310

 A300 TG-310 
Manual focus More precise focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Sony A300

 TG-310 A300 
Screen dimensions2.7"2.7"Equal screen size
Screen resolution230k230kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-310 comes with outer measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony A300 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).

Check the Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A300 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the TG-310 against the A300.

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A300 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-310 and A300 is 94 and 64 respectively.

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's hard to picture the contrast in sensor measurements simply by viewing specifications. The graphic here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-310 and A300.

Plainly, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The TG-310 due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Olympus TG-310 will provide you with more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more recent TG-310 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-310 Portrait photography features
Sony A300 Portrait photography features
33
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
provides face detection focus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
59
manual focus
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
sensor resolution low (10MP)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-310 Street photography info
Sony A300 Street photography info
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
lighter than competition (155g)
fixed screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
74
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-310 Sports photography highlights
Sony A300 Sports photography highlights
40
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
provides tracking autofocus
weather proof
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
low battery life (150 CIPA)
no phase detect auto focus
54
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
comes with phase detect auto focus
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-310 as a Travel photography camera
Sony A300 as a Travel photography camera
67
lighter than competition (155 grams)
weather proof
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse function
low battery life (150 CIPA)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
45
flash built-in
does not have Timelapse mode
sensor resolution low (10MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus TG-310
Landscape photography with Sony A300
39
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
weather proof
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
lack of manual mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
low battery life (150 shots)
missing Time Lapse function
57
manual focus
switch lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
does not have Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus TG-310
Vlogging with Sony A300
32
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focus
lighter than competition (155g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external mic support
9
no video recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-310 and Sony A300
 Olympus TG-310Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus TG-310 Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
Type Waterproof Entry-Level DSLR
Released 2011-01-06 2008-01-30
Body design Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III+ -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 3872 x 2592
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 28-102mm (3.6x) -
Maximum aperture f/3.9-5.9 -
Macro focus range 3cm -
Available lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 1.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.20 m 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155g (0.34 lbs) 632g (1.39 lbs)
Physical dimensions 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 64
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.5
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.4
DXO Low light score not tested 538
Other
Battery life 150 photographs -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model LI-42B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash
Storage slots Single Single
Price at launch $0 $0