Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A390
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Older Model is Sony A380
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A390 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus TG-310 and Sony A390, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the TG-310 (14MP) and the A390 (14MP) is fairly well matched but the TG-310 (1/2.3") and A390 (APS-C) feature different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-310 was manufactured 6 months later than the A390 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the TG-310 scores against the A390 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A390 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-310 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-310 Gallery & Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Sony A390
| TG-310 | A390 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus TG-310
| A390 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Sony A390
| TG-310 | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 |  | July 2010 | Similar age |
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical display measurements |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-310 has got exterior dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony A390 has proportions of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") and a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-310 and Sony A390 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-310 and the A390.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-310 and A390 is 94 and 66 respectively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing purely by checking specifications. The photograph here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-310 and A390.
To sum up, both of these cameras have got the exact same MP but different sensor sizing. The TG-310 provides the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining bokeh more challenging.
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A390 Specifications
| Olympus TG-310 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus TG-310 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
| Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Revealed | 2011-01-06 | 2010-07-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lb) | 549 grams (1.21 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 607 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 shots | 230 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $500 |
