Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A900
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Introduced October 2008
- Newer Model is Sony A99
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A900 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A900, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the TG-310 (14MP) and A900 (25MP) and the TG-310 (1/2.3") and A900 (Full frame) posses totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-310 was announced 2 years after the A900 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the TG-310 matches up against the A900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A900 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-310 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-310 Gallery and Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Sony A900
| TG-310 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | October 2008 | Newer by 27 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Olympus TG-310
| A900 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Sony A900
| TG-310 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-310 features exterior dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony A900 has dimensions of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A900 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the TG-310 against the A900.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-310 and A900 is 94 and 54 respectively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading through specs. The pic underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-310 and A900.
All in all, both of those cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-310 with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony A900 will give greater detail with its extra 11MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more recent TG-310 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A900 Specifications
| Olympus TG-310 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus TG-310 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
| Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2011-01-06 | 2008-10-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 25MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 6048 x 4032 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lb) | 895 gr (1.97 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 79 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1431 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 photos | 880 photos |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | NP-FM500H |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
| Card slots | Single | Two |
| Cost at release | $0 | $2,736 |