Clicky

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A6300

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
33
Overall
35
Olympus TG-310 front
 
Sony Alpha a6300 front
Portability
83
Imaging
67
Features
82
Overall
73

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A6300 Key Specs

Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Sony A6300
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600 (Increase to 51200)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
  • Introduced February 2016
  • Older Model is Sony A6000
  • Replacement is Sony A6500
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A6300 Overview

Here is a in depth assessment of the Olympus TG-310 and Sony A6300, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the TG-310 (14MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the TG-310 (1/2.3") and A6300 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The TG-310 was announced 6 years prior to the A6300 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the TG-310 grades vs the A6300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Sony A6300

 TG-310 A6300 

Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Olympus TG-310

 A6300 TG-310 
IntroducedFebruary 2016January 2011Fresher by 61 months
Manually focus Dial exact focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution922k230kSharper display (+692k dot)

Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Sony A6300

 TG-310 A6300 
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch display Neither has Touch display

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-310 has outside measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony A6300 has measurements of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus TG-310 and Sony A6300 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-310 versus the A6300.

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A6300 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the TG-310 and A6300 is 94 and 83 respectively.

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A6300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing merely by reading through technical specs. The visual below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-310 and A6300.

As you have seen, both of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The TG-310 with its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sony A6300 will give greater detail with its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older TG-310 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A6300 sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A6300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-310 Portrait photography advice
Sony A6300 Portrait photography advice
33
megapixel count decent (14MP)
has face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
80
has manual focus
decent MP (24 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
provides face detection focusing
exports RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-310 as a Street photography camera
Sony A6300 as a Street photography camera
66
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
lighter than competition (155g)
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
79
screen tilts up and down
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
weather proofing
good ISO range (25,600)
lack of image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-310 Sports photography features
Sony A6300 Sports photography features
40
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
weather sealing
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
low battery power (150 CIPA)
lack of phase detect autofocus
75
decent MP (24 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
provides tracking autofocus
weather proofing
sensor has phase detect AF
lack of image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus TG-310
Travel photography with Sony A6300
67
lighter than competition (155g)
weather sealing
megapixel count decent (14MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
no Timelapse recording
low battery power (150 shots)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
76
weather proofing
decent MP (24MP)
has built in flash
screen isn't selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-310 Landscape photography highlights
Sony A6300 Landscape photography highlights
39
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
weather sealing
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
low battery power (150 shots)
no Timelapse recording
79
has manual focus
change lenses (Sony E mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
decent MP (24 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
weather proofing
lack of image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-310 Vlogging info
Sony A6300 Vlogging info
32
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection autofocus
lighter than competition (155 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external microphone socket
35
provides face detection focusing
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
includes external microphone jack
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A6300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-310 and Sony A6300
 Olympus TG-310Sony Alpha a6300
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus TG-310 Sony Alpha a6300
Type Waterproof Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2011-01-06 2016-02-03
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III+ BIONZ X
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 24 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 6000 x 4000
Maximum native ISO 1600 25600
Maximum boosted ISO - 51200
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 425
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony E
Lens focal range 28-102mm (3.6x) -
Largest aperture f/3.9-5.9 -
Macro focus range 3cm -
Amount of lenses - 121
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dot 922k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames per sec 11.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.20 m 6.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 3840x2160
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155 grams (0.34 lb) 404 grams (0.89 lb)
Dimensions 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 85
DXO Color Depth score not tested 24.4
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.7
DXO Low light score not tested 1437
Other
Battery life 150 pictures 400 pictures
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-42B NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature With downloadable app
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch price $0 $889