Clicky

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony H200

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
33
Overall
35
Olympus TG-310 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 front
Portability
67
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony H200 Key Specs

Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Announced January 2011
Sony H200
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
  • Launched January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony H200 Overview

Following is a in depth review of the Olympus TG-310 versus Sony H200, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the TG-310 (14MP) and H200 (20MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The TG-310 was brought out 24 months prior to the H200 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the TG-310 scores against the H200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Sony H200

 TG-310 H200 

Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Olympus TG-310

 H200 TG-310 
LaunchedJanuary 2013January 2011More modern by 24 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Sony H200

 TG-310 H200 
Manually focus No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-310 has outside dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony H200 has dimensions of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).

Check out the Olympus TG-310 versus Sony H200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-310 compared to the H200.

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony H200 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-310 and H200 is 94 and 67 respectively.

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony H200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading through a spec sheet. The picture here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-310 and H200.

As you can see, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Sony H200 to give you more detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged TG-310 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony H200 sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony H200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-310 Portrait photography information
Sony H200 Portrait photography information
33
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
provides face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
37
decent MP (20MP)
comes with face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-310 Street photography advice
Sony H200 Street photography advice
66
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
lighter than competition (155 grams)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
45
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
heavier than average in class (530g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-310 Sports photography factors
Sony H200 Sports photography factors
40
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
provides tracking autofocus
environment proof
low frames per second (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery (150 shots)
has no phase detect AF
47
amazing zoom range (24-633mm 26.4 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (240 CIPA)
has no phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-310 as a Travel photography camera
Sony H200 as a Travel photography camera
67
lighter than competition (155g)
environment proof
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
terrible battery (150 shots)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.9)
53
decent MP (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
very long reach (633mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
bad battery pack (240 CIPA)
heavier than average in class (530 grams)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-310 Landscape photography features
Sony H200 Landscape photography features
39
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
environment proof
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
terrible battery (150 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
40
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (20MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
no manual mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
bad battery pack (240 per charge)
missing Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-310 Vlogging features
Sony H200 Vlogging features
32
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focusing
lighter than competition (155 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone jack
25
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection autofocus
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external mic socket
heavier than average in class (530 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony H200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-310 and Sony H200
 Olympus TG-310Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus TG-310 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200
Class Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2011-01-06 2013-01-08
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III+ -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 5184 x 2920
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) 24-633mm (26.4x)
Maximal aperture f/3.9-5.9 f/3.1-5.9
Macro focusing range 3cm 20cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology TFT Color LCD ClearPhoto LCD display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 1.0fps 8.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.20 m 6.80 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155 grams (0.34 pounds) 530 grams (1.17 pounds)
Dimensions 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 150 pictures 240 pictures
Battery type Battery Pack AA
Battery ID LI-42B 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $0 $250