Olympus TG-310 vs Sony H55
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
![Olympus TG-310 front Olympus TG-310 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-TG-310/Olympus-TG-310-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H55/Sony-H55-front.jpg)
92 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony H55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 200g - 103 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony H55 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus TG-310 and Sony H55, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the TG-310 (14MP) and the H55 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The TG-310 was introduced 7 months later than the H55 so they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise overview of how the TG-310 matches up versus the H55 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony H55 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-310 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-310 Gallery & Sony H55 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Sony H55
TG-310 | H55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2011 | ![]() | June 2010 | More recent by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Sony H55 over the Olympus TG-310
H55 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Sony H55
TG-310 | H55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony H55 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-310 enjoys physical dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony H55 has proportions of 103mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-310 and Sony H55 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-310 vs the H55.
![Olympus TG-310 vs Sony H55 size comparison Olympus TG-310 vs Sony H55 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-TG-310-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H55-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-310 and H55 is 94 and 92 respectively.
![Olympus TG-310 vs Sony H55 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-310 vs Sony H55 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-TG-310-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H55-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony H55 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements just by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-310 and H55.
As you can see, both cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of pictures but you should consider the age of the cameras into account. The more recent TG-310 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
![Olympus TG-310 vs Sony H55 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-310 vs Sony H55 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-TG-310-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H55-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony H55 Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus TG-310 vs Sony H55 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-310 vs Sony H55 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-TG-310-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H55-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony H55 Specifications
Olympus TG-310 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus TG-310 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2011-01-06 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.20 m | 3.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Slow Syncro, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155 gr (0.34 pounds) | 200 gr (0.44 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 103 x 58 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-42B | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo/ PRO HG-Duo, SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $0 | $235 |