Olympus TG-310 vs Sony HX1
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
67 Imaging
32 Features
36 Overall
33
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony HX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 544g - 115 x 83 x 92mm
- Released April 2009
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-310 vs Sony HX1 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus TG-310 versus Sony HX1, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the TG-310 (14MP) and HX1 (9MP) and the TG-310 (1/2.3") and HX1 (1/2.4") offer totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-310 was unveiled 21 months after the HX1 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief view of how the TG-310 grades against the HX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-310 vs Sony HX1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-310 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-310 Gallery and Sony HX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Sony HX1
| TG-310 | HX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | April 2009 | More modern by 21 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX1 over the Olympus TG-310
| HX1 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Sony HX1
| TG-310 | HX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony HX1 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-310 enjoys external measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony HX1 has dimensions of 115mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") and a weight of 544 grams (1.20 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-310 versus Sony HX1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the TG-310 vs the HX1.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-310 and HX1 is 94 and 67 respectively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony HX1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizes only by seeing a spec sheet. The picture here may offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-310 and HX1.
Clearly, the two cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-310 having a bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus TG-310 will provide extra detail having an extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more recent TG-310 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony HX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony HX1 Specifications
| Olympus TG-310 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus TG-310 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-01-06 | 2009-04-22 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-560mm (20.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.2 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | 9.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1440x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 pounds) | 544g (1.20 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 115 x 83 x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-42B | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $0 | $47,999 |