Olympus TG-310 vs Sony HX99
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
91 Imaging
45 Features
67 Overall
53
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony HX99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3-inch Sensor
- 3.00" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 242g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Revealed September 2018
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-310 vs Sony HX99 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Olympus TG-310 versus Sony HX99, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the TG-310 (14MP) and HX99 (18MP) and the TG-310 (1/2.3") and HX99 (1/2.3-inch) come with different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-310 was unveiled 8 years earlier than the HX99 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summary of how the TG-310 grades versus the HX99 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-310 vs Sony HX99 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-310 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-310 Gallery & Sony HX99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Sony HX99
| TG-310 | HX99 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX99 over the Olympus TG-310
| HX99 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2018 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 93 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3.00" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Sony HX99
| TG-310 | HX99 |
|---|
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony HX99 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-310 has outside dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony HX99 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 242 grams (0.53 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-310 versus Sony HX99 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is the front view scale comparison of the TG-310 against the HX99.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-310 and HX99 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony HX99 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements purely by checking out a spec sheet. The visual below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-310 and HX99.
As you can see, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TG-310 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Sony HX99 will show extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older TG-310 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony HX99 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony HX99 Specifications
| Olympus TG-310 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus TG-310 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-01-06 | 2018-09-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3-inch |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 18MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-6.4 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3.00" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 638 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.5x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) | 242 gr (0.53 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 images | 360 images |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $0 | $469 |