Olympus TG-310 vs Sony RX10 III
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
53 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Launched March 2016
- Succeeded the Sony RX10 II
- Updated by Sony RX10 IV
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-310 vs Sony RX10 III Overview
Below is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus TG-310 versus Sony RX10 III, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the TG-310 (14MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the TG-310 (1/2.3") and RX10 III (1") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-310 was launched 6 years before the RX10 III and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the TG-310 matches up against the RX10 III when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-310 vs Sony RX10 III Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-310 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-310 Gallery and Sony RX10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Sony RX10 III
| TG-310 | RX10 III |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Olympus TG-310
| RX10 III | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2016 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 63 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1229k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+999k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Sony RX10 III
| TG-310 | RX10 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-310 enjoys physical dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony RX10 III has dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") accompanied by a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-310 versus Sony RX10 III in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the TG-310 against the RX10 III.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-310 and RX10 III is 94 and 53 respectively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements only by checking specs. The graphic underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-310 and RX10 III.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The TG-310 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Sony RX10 III will give greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older TG-310 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
| Olympus TG-310 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus TG-310 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
| Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2011-01-06 | 2016-03-29 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | - | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.4-4.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 14.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 gr (0.34 pounds) | 1051 gr (2.32 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 70 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 472 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 pictures | 420 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $0 | $1,398 |
