Olympus TG-310 vs Sony WX220
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
96 Imaging
43 Features
41 Overall
42
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony WX220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
- Launched February 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-310 vs Sony WX220 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus TG-310 versus Sony WX220, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the TG-310 (14MP) and WX220 (18MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-310 was revealed 4 years before the WX220 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera and the Sony WX220 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the TG-310 matches up versus the WX220 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-310 vs Sony WX220 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-310 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-310 Gallery and Sony WX220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Sony WX220
| TG-310 | WX220 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony WX220 over the Olympus TG-310
| WX220 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 37 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Sony WX220
| TG-310 | WX220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony WX220 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-310 features outer measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony WX220 has measurements of 92mm x 52mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-310 versus Sony WX220 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the TG-310 versus the WX220.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-310 and WX220 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony WX220 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to see the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading technical specs. The visual below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-310 and WX220.
As you can tell, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Sony WX220 to deliver extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The older TG-310 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony WX220 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony WX220 Specifications
| Olympus TG-310 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus TG-310 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2011-01-06 | 2014-02-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 18MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | 3.70 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, on, slow synchro, off, advanced |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) | 121 grams (0.27 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 pictures | 210 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $198 |
