Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Launched May 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Here is a in depth review of the Olympus TG-320 and Olympus TG-1 iHS, both Waterproof cameras and both are produced by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-320 was announced 3 months earlier than the TG-1 iHS and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the TG-320 grades vs the TG-1 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-320 & Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| TG-320 | TG-1 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus TG-320
| TG-1 iHS | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 610k | 230k | Clearer screen (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
| TG-320 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 | May 2012 | Same age | |
| Manually focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-320 enjoys physical dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Olympus TG-1 iHS has proportions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-320 and Olympus TG-1 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-320 versus the TG-1 iHS.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and TG-1 iHS is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to see the gap in sensor sizing just by checking out specifications. The photograph here will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-320 and TG-1 iHS.
To sum up, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Olympus TG-320 to show more detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots more aggressively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-01-10 | 2012-05-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 610k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 images | 350 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | LI90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $399 |