Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-3
Portability
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
Olympus TG-3
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Later Model is Olympus TG-4
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus TG-320 versus Olympus TG-3, both Waterproof digital cameras and both are built by Olympus. The image resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the TG-3 (16MP) is relatively similar and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-320 was brought out 3 years prior to the TG-3 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the TG-320 matches up versus the TG-3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-320 and Olympus Tough TG-3. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus TG-3
| TG-320 | TG-3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Olympus TG-320
| TG-3 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2014 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 27 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Olympus TG-3
| TG-320 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-320 comes with physical dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-3 has sizing of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-320 versus Olympus TG-3 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-320 against the TG-3.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and TG-3 is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The image below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-320 and TG-3.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Olympus TG-3 to offer extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged TG-320 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography advice
Olympus TG-3 Portrait photography advice
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
has face detect focusing
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
good resolution (16 megapixels)
offers face detect focus
no manual focus
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Street photography details
Olympus TG-3 Street photography details
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
lighter than competition (155g)
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
heavier than competitors in class (247g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Olympus TG-320 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-3 as a Sports photography camera
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
has tracking focus
weather proofing
max frames per second low (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
low battery power (150 per charge)
lack of phase detect AF
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
environment proofing
great battery power (330 CIPA)
low frames per second (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-320 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-3 as a Travel photography camera
lighter than competition (155g)
weather proofing
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse mode
low battery power (150 shots)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
great battery power (330 per charge)
environment proofing
good resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
heavier than competitors in class (247 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography details
Olympus TG-3 Landscape photography details
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
weather proofing
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
manual mode not available
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
low battery power (150 per charge)
missing Timelapse mode
fairly wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16MP)
environment proofing
great battery power (330 shots)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-320 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-3 as a Vlogging camera
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focusing
lighter than competition (155g)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing microphone support
fairly wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of mic port
heavier than competitors in class (247 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus TG-320 | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2014-03-31 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lb) | 247 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 photographs | 330 photographs |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $350 |
