Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-5
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
![Olympus TG-320 front Olympus TG-320 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-TG-320/Olympus-TG-320-front.jpg)
![Olympus Tough TG-5 front Olympus Tough TG-5 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-Tough-TG-5/Olympus-TG-5-front.jpg)
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Announced May 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-4
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-6
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-5 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus TG-320 versus Olympus TG-5, both Waterproof digital cameras and both of them are offered by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the TG-5 (12MP) is very similar and they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
The TG-320 was released 6 years before the TG-5 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the TG-320 grades against the TG-5 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-5 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-320 & Olympus Tough TG-5. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Olympus TG-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus TG-5
TG-320 | TG-5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Olympus TG-320
TG-5 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2017 | ![]() | January 2012 | More modern by 65 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Olympus TG-5
TG-320 | TG-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-5 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-320 has exterior measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Olympus TG-5 has dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-320 versus Olympus TG-5 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-320 against the TG-5.
![Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-5 size comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-5 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-TG-320-vs-Olympus-Tough-TG-5-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and TG-5 is 94 and 90 respectively.
![Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-5 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-5 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-TG-320-vs-Olympus-Tough-TG-5-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-5 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading a spec sheet. The image below will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-320 and TG-5.
As you can see, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-320 to deliver more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged TG-320 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
![Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-5 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-5 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-TG-320-vs-Olympus-Tough-TG-5-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-TG-320-vs-Olympus-Tough-TG-5-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-5 Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Olympus Tough TG-5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Olympus Tough TG-5 |
Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2017-05-17 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 20.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 155g (0.34 lb) | 250g (0.55 lb) |
Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 photos | 340 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $0 | $449 |