Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-6
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
90 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Revealed May 2019
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-5
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-6 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-6, both Waterproof digital cameras and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. The resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the TG-6 (12MP) is very similar and both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-320 was announced 8 years before the TG-6 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a brief view of how the TG-320 scores against the TG-6 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-6 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-320 & Olympus Tough TG-6. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Olympus TG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus TG-6
| TG-320 | TG-6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Olympus TG-320
| TG-6 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2019 | January 2012 | More recent by 89 months | |
| Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Olympus TG-6
| TG-320 | TG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-6 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-320 enjoys exterior dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-6 has measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-6 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-320 compared to the TG-6.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and TG-6 is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-6 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to visualise the difference between sensor measurements merely by going over a spec sheet. The photograph below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-320 and TG-6.
As you can see, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-320 to offer you extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos more aggressively. The older TG-320 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-6 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Olympus Tough TG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Olympus Tough TG-6 |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-01-10 | 2019-05-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,040k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 20.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lb) | 253 grams (0.56 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 shots | 340 shots |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $0 | $449 |