Clicky

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus VR-330

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
33
Overall
35
Olympus TG-320 front
 
Olympus VR-330 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
38
Overall
37

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs

Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Introduced January 2012
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Announced February 2011
  • Earlier Model is Olympus VR-320
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview

Below is a complete assessment of the Olympus TG-320 and Olympus VR-330, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are offered by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is pretty similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The TG-320 was released 12 months later than the VR-330 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the TG-320 grades versus the VR-330 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus VR-330

 TG-320 VR-330 
AnnouncedJanuary 2012February 2011More recent by 12 months

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus TG-320

 VR-330 TG-320 
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Olympus VR-330

 TG-320 VR-330 
Manually focus No manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to lug around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-320 has got outside dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus TG-320 and Olympus VR-330 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the TG-320 compared to the VR-330.

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and VR-330 is 94 and 94 respectively.

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading technical specs. The graphic below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-320 and VR-330.

As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact MP therefore you should expect similar quality of images though you really should factor the production date of the products into consideration. The newer TG-320 should have an advantage in sensor technology.

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-320 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Portrait photography camera
33
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
supports face detect focus
no manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
33
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
has face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Street photography advice
Olympus VR-330 Street photography advice
66
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
lighter than competition (155 grams)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (158g)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Sports photography information
Olympus VR-330 Sports photography information
40
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
weather sealing
low fps (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
low battery power (150 CIPA)
does not have phase detect auto focus
47
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
has tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Travel photography information
Olympus VR-330 Travel photography information
67
lighter than competition (155g)
weather sealing
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
low battery power (150 per charge)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
70
lighter than competitors in class (158 grams)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
lack of Timelapse function
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-320 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Landscape photography camera
39
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
weather sealing
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
low battery power (150 CIPA)
lack of Time Lapse recording
42
reasonably wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Vlogging highlights
Olympus VR-330 Vlogging highlights
32
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focus
lighter than competition (155g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic socket
32
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection autofocus
lighter than competitors in class (158g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-320 and Olympus VR-330
 Olympus TG-320Olympus VR-330
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus TG-320 Olympus VR-330
Type Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2012-01-10 2011-02-08
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III+ TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 1600 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-102mm (3.6x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus distance 3cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech TFT Color LCD TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.80 m 4.70 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155g (0.34 pounds) 158g (0.35 pounds)
Dimensions 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 150 pictures -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model LI-42B LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $0 $220