Clicky

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-1

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
33
Overall
35
Olympus TG-320 front
 
Olympus XZ-1 front
Portability
88
Imaging
35
Features
51
Overall
41

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs

Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Released January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview

Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus TG-320 and Olympus XZ-1, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both produced by Olympus. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") use totally different sensor dimensions.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The TG-320 was announced 12 months after the XZ-1 and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the TG-320 grades against the XZ-1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus XZ-1

 TG-320 XZ-1 
ReleasedJanuary 2012January 2011Newer by 12 months

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus TG-320

 XZ-1 TG-320 
Manually focus Very exact focus
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution614k230kClearer display (+384k dot)

Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Olympus XZ-1

 TG-320 XZ-1 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither features Touch friendly display

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison

When you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-320 enjoys outside dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).

Compare the Olympus TG-320 and Olympus XZ-1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-320 and the XZ-1.

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and XZ-1 is 94 and 88 respectively.

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions simply by going over a spec sheet. The image here might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-320 and XZ-1.

Clearly, both the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The TG-320 using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus TG-320 will offer extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more modern TG-320 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography info
Olympus XZ-1 Portrait photography info
33
good megapixels (14MP)
comes with face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
45
manual focus
has face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/1.63")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-320 as a Street photography camera
Olympus XZ-1 as a Street photography camera
66
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
59
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/1.63")
heavier than competitors (275 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus TG-320
Sports photography with Olympus XZ-1
40
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
environment proofing
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (150 per charge)
lack of phase detect AF
38
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking autofocus
great battery power (320 per charge)
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/1.63")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Travel photography advice
Olympus XZ-1 Travel photography advice
67
lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
environment proofing
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse recording
terrible battery life (150 shots)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
62
great battery power (320 per charge)
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
does not have Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors (275g)
megapixel count low (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography features
Olympus XZ-1 Landscape photography features
39
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
environment proofing
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
terrible battery life (150 shots)
missing Timelapse recording
54
manual focus
quite wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
great battery power (320 per charge)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/1.63")
does not have Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Vlogging highlights
Olympus XZ-1 Vlogging highlights
32
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focusing
lighter than competition in class (155g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing microphone jack
31
quite wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection autofocus
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic support
heavier than competitors (275g)
Photography Glossary

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-320 and Olympus XZ-1
 Olympus TG-320Olympus XZ-1
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus TG-320 Olympus XZ-1
Category Waterproof Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2012-01-10 2011-01-26
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III+ TruePic V
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.63"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 8.07 x 5.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 44.9mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 3664 x 2752
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points - 11
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) 28-112mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/1.8-2.5
Macro focusing range 3cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7" 3"
Display resolution 230k dots 614k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology TFT Color LCD OLED
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.80 m 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155 gr (0.34 lb) 275 gr (0.61 lb)
Dimensions 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 34
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 18.8
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 117
Other
Battery life 150 photos 320 photos
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-42B Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $0 $567