Clicky

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
33
Overall
35
Olympus TG-320 front
 
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs

Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Introduced December 2012
Photography Glossary

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview

On this page, we will be comparing the Olympus TG-320 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both designed by Olympus. The resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively well matched but the TG-320 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor size.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The TG-320 was revealed 11 months earlier than the XZ-2 iHS so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the TG-320 scores vs the XZ-2 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 TG-320 XZ-2 iHS 

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus TG-320

 XZ-2 iHS TG-320 
IntroducedDecember 2012January 2012Fresher by 11 months
Manually focus Very exact focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kCrisper screen (+690k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 TG-320 XZ-2 iHS 
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry your camera often, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-320 has got outer measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).

Check the Olympus TG-320 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-320 vs the XZ-2 iHS.

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-320 and XZ-2 iHS is 94 and 85 respectively.

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-320 and XZ-2 iHS.

Clearly, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The TG-320 having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus TG-320 will give extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older TG-320 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography details
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography details
33
good megapixels (14MP)
features face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
46
manual focus
supports face detection focus
saves RAW formats
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus TG-320
Street photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
fixed screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
66
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
more heavy than average in class (346 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus TG-320
Sports photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
40
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14MP)
features tracking autofocus
weather sealing
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (150 per charge)
lacks phase detect auto focus
43
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking autofocus
better than average battery (340 per charge)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Travel photography advice
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography advice
67
lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
weather sealing
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse function
terrible battery power (150 CIPA)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
61
better than average battery (340 CIPA)
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
no Timelapse function
more heavy than average in class (346g)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography advice
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography advice
39
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
weather sealing
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual exposure
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
terrible battery power (150 per charge)
does not have Timelapse function
55
manual focus
rather wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
better than average battery (340 CIPA)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
no Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Vlogging details
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Vlogging details
32
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focus
lighter than competition in class (155g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external microphone port
36
rather wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
includes external microphone jack
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
more heavy than average in class (346g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-320 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
 Olympus TG-320Olympus XZ-2 iHS
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus TG-320 Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Category Waterproof Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2012-01-10 2012-12-18
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III+ -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 1600 12800
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 35
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) 28-112mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/1.8-2.5
Macro focusing range 3cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.80 m 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155 gr (0.34 lb) 346 gr (0.76 lb)
Physical dimensions 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 49
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 20.4
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 216
Other
Battery life 150 images 340 images
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-42B Li-90B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $0 $450