Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Olympus TG-320 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both designed by Olympus. The resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively well matched but the TG-320 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-320 was revealed 11 months earlier than the XZ-2 iHS so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the TG-320 scores vs the XZ-2 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-320 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| TG-320 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus TG-320
| XZ-2 iHS | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | December 2012 |  | January 2012 | Fresher by 11 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| TG-320 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera often, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-320 has got outer measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-320 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-320 vs the XZ-2 iHS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-320 and XZ-2 iHS is 94 and 85 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-320 and XZ-2 iHS.
Clearly, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The TG-320 having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus TG-320 will give extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older TG-320 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lb) | 346 gr (0.76 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 images | 340 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $450 |