Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS200
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Alternative Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS100
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic ZS200, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") boast totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-320 was brought out 7 years earlier than the ZS200 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the TG-320 grades versus the ZS200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Panasonic ZS200
| TG-320 | ZS200 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus TG-320
| ZS200 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2018 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 74 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1240k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+1010k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic ZS200
| TG-320 | ZS200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-320 comes with outside measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS200 has proportions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic ZS200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-320 vs the ZS200.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-320 and ZS200 is 94 and 86 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements only by viewing technical specs. The graphic underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-320 and ZS200.
As you have seen, each of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The TG-320 due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Panasonic ZS200 will provide you with extra detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images way more aggressively. The older TG-320 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
| Other name | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
| Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2018-02-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | MOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 49 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 1,240k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 lb) | 340g (0.75 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 pictures | 370 pictures |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $800 |