Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FS25
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Portability
95 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30
95 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FS25 Key Specs
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Panasonic FS25
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 148g - 97 x 58 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FS25 Overview
Here is a extended review of the Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FS25, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the FS25 (12MP) is relatively similar and both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-320 was announced 2 years later than the FS25 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a full comparison, here is a short introduction of how the TG-320 scores against the FS25 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FS25 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-320 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Panasonic FS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Panasonic FS25
| TG-320 | FS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 36 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS25 over the Olympus TG-320
| FS25 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic FS25
| TG-320 | FS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FS25 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-320 features physical measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS25 has measurements of 97mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FS25 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-320 and the FS25.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-320 and FS25 is 94 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FS25 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading specifications. The photograph here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-320 and FS25.
To sum up, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Olympus TG-320 to offer extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The newer TG-320 will have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography factors
Panasonic FS25 Portrait photography factors
MP count good (14MP)
features face detect focus
manual focus not available
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
features face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
low resolution (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-320 as a Street photography camera
Panasonic FS25 as a Street photography camera
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
lighter than average in class (155 grams)
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Sports photography information
Panasonic FS25 Sports photography information
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
features tracking focus
environment proof
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (150 shots)
lacks phase detect auto focus
image stabilization (Optical)
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
low resolution (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus TG-320
Travel photography with Panasonic FS25
lighter than average in class (155 grams)
environment proof
MP count good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
not so great battery power (150 CIPA)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
built-in flash
missing Time Lapse recording
low resolution (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (29mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography features
Panasonic FS25 Landscape photography features
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
environment proof
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7")
manual exposure not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
not so great battery power (150 CIPA)
lack of Timelapse recording
screen is a good size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (29mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
manual exposure not available
low resolution (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
missing Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus TG-320
Vlogging with Panasonic FS25
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focus
lighter than average in class (155g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of microphone port
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection autofocus
wide angle not the best (29mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external mic support
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FS25 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-01-10 | 2009-01-27 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 29-145mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | 5.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 lb) | 148g (0.33 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 97 x 58 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $230 |