Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35


55 Imaging
51 Features
80 Overall
62
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 831g - 137 x 99 x 131mm
- Introduced June 2014
- Successor is Panasonic FZ2500

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus TG-320 versus Panasonic FZ1000, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and FZ1000 (20MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and FZ1000 (1") provide different sensor size.

The TG-320 was revealed 3 years earlier than the FZ1000 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief overview of how the TG-320 grades vs the FZ1000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-320 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Panasonic FZ1000
TG-320 | FZ1000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 over the Olympus TG-320
FZ1000 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2014 | ![]() | January 2012 | Fresher by 29 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic FZ1000
TG-320 | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-320 comes with physical measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ1000 has dimensions of 137mm x 99mm x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") along with a weight of 831 grams (1.83 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-320 versus Panasonic FZ1000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-320 against the FZ1000.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and FZ1000 is 94 and 55 respectively.

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing only by looking through specifications. The photograph here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-320 and FZ1000.
To sum up, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-320 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Panasonic FZ1000 will provide you with greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older TG-320 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-01-10 | 2014-06-12 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m | 13.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 155 gr (0.34 pounds) | 831 gr (1.83 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 137 x 99 x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 517 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 pictures | 360 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $0 | $800 |