Clicky

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
33
Overall
35
Olympus TG-320 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 front
Portability
55
Imaging
51
Features
80
Overall
62

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Key Specs

Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Released January 2012
Panasonic FZ1000
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
  • 831g - 137 x 99 x 131mm
  • Introduced June 2014
  • Successor is Panasonic FZ2500
Photography Glossary

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Overview

Lets look much closer at the Olympus TG-320 versus Panasonic FZ1000, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and FZ1000 (20MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and FZ1000 (1") provide different sensor size.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The TG-320 was revealed 3 years earlier than the FZ1000 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief overview of how the TG-320 grades vs the FZ1000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Panasonic FZ1000

 TG-320 FZ1000 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 over the Olympus TG-320

 FZ1000 TG-320 
IntroducedJune 2014January 2012Fresher by 29 months
Manually focus Dial accurate focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution921k230kClearer screen (+691k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic FZ1000

 TG-320 FZ1000 
Touch screen Neither comes with Touch screen

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-320 comes with physical measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ1000 has dimensions of 137mm x 99mm x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") along with a weight of 831 grams (1.83 lbs).

Check out the Olympus TG-320 versus Panasonic FZ1000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-320 against the FZ1000.

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and FZ1000 is 94 and 55 respectively.

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing only by looking through specifications. The photograph here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-320 and FZ1000.

To sum up, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-320 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Panasonic FZ1000 will provide you with greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older TG-320 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography factors
Panasonic FZ1000 Portrait photography factors
33
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
includes face detection focus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
70
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (20MP)
good sensor size (1")
includes face detect focus
saves RAW formats
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus TG-320
Street photography with Panasonic FZ1000
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
lighter than average in class (155 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
70
screen articulates
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good sensor size (1")
saves RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Sports photography details
Panasonic FZ1000 Sports photography details
40
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
weather proofing
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
not so great battery (150 CIPA)
does not have phase detect auto focus
67
long zoom range (25-400mm 16.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (1")
includes tracking focus
has no phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Travel photography information
Panasonic FZ1000 Travel photography information
67
lighter than average in class (155 grams)
weather proofing
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
not so great battery (150 CIPA)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
65
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
selfie friendly screen
reasonably wide (25mm)
very long reach (400mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-320 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic FZ1000 as a Landscape photography camera
39
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
weather proofing
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
not so great battery (150 CIPA)
missing Time Lapse recording
64
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20MP)
good sensor size (1")
saves RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus TG-320
Vlogging with Panasonic FZ1000
32
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focus
lighter than average in class (155g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external mic jack
66
reasonably wide (25mm)
selfie friendly screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
does have mic port
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic FZ1000
 Olympus TG-320Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus TG-320 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000
Type Waterproof Large Sensor Superzoom
Released 2012-01-10 2014-06-12
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III+ Venus Engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 5472 x 3648
Maximum native ISO 1600 12800
Maximum boosted ISO - 25600
Minimum native ISO 80 125
RAW photos
Minimum boosted ISO - 80
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 49
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) 25-400mm (16.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/2.8-4.0
Macro focusing range 3cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 2.7
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dot 921k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames/s 12.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.80 m 13.50 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 3840x2160
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155 gr (0.34 pounds) 831 gr (1.83 pounds)
Physical dimensions 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") 137 x 99 x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 64
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.1
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.7
DXO Low light rating not tested 517
Other
Battery life 150 pictures 360 pictures
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-42B DMW-BLC12PP
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $0 $800