Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ70
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35


63 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 606g - 130 x 97 x 118mm
- Launched July 2013

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ70 Overview
Following is a extended overview of the Olympus TG-320 versus Panasonic FZ70, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the FZ70 (16MP) is relatively close and they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The TG-320 was launched 18 months before the FZ70 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ70 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a brief summation of how the TG-320 grades versus the FZ70 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ70 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-320 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Panasonic FZ70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Panasonic FZ70
TG-320 | FZ70 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ70 over the Olympus TG-320
FZ70 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2013 | ![]() | January 2012 | More modern by 18 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic FZ70
TG-320 | FZ70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ70 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-320 enjoys outer dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ70 has specifications of 130mm x 97mm x 118mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 4.6") having a weight of 606 grams (1.34 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-320 versus Panasonic FZ70 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the TG-320 and the FZ70.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-320 and FZ70 is 94 and 63 respectively.

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ70 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes simply by looking through a spec sheet. The pic below may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-320 and FZ70.
As you can see, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Panasonic FZ70 to provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged TG-320 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ70 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ70 Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus TG-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2013-07-18 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 202k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 9.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 13.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (50i/60i, 25p/30p), 1280 x 720p (50p/60p or 25p/30p), 640 x 480 (25p/30p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) | 606 gr (1.34 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 130 x 97 x 118mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 4.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 41 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 171 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 photographs | 400 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $0 | $300 |