Clicky

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic GX850

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
33
Overall
35
Olympus TG-320 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX850 front
Portability
90
Imaging
54
Features
70
Overall
60

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic GX850 Key Specs

Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2012
Panasonic GX850
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 269g - 107 x 65 x 33mm
  • Released January 2017
  • Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-GX800 / Lumix DMC-GF9
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic GX850 Overview

The following is a extensive review of the Olympus TG-320 versus Panasonic GX850, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the GX850 (16MP) is relatively comparable but the TG-320 (1/2.3") and GX850 (Four Thirds) enjoy different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The TG-320 was launched 6 years earlier than the GX850 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GX850 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief summation of how the TG-320 matches up vs the GX850 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Panasonic GX850

 TG-320 GX850 

Reasons to pick Panasonic GX850 over the Olympus TG-320

 GX850 TG-320 
ReleasedJanuary 2017January 2012Newer by 60 months
Manually focus More precise focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1040k230kClearer screen (+810k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic GX850

 TG-320 GX850 

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic GX850 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to travel with your camera, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-320 comes with physical dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GX850 has proportions of 107mm x 65mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).

Compare the Olympus TG-320 versus Panasonic GX850 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-320 against the GX850.

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic GX850 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and GX850 is 94 and 90 respectively.

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic GX850 top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic GX850 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be difficult to picture the gap in sensor dimensions simply by going through a spec sheet. The picture below will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-320 and GX850.

As you can see, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-320 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Panasonic GX850 will produce more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged TG-320 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic GX850 sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic GX850 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic GX850 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-320 as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic GX850 as a Portrait photography camera
33
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
comes with face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
65
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
features face detect focus
saves RAW files
external flash not possible
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Street photography advice
Panasonic GX850 Street photography advice
66
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
lighter than others (155g)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
80
has a tilting screen
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
comes with touch focus
great high ISO (25,600)
no image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-320 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic GX850 as a Sports photography camera
40
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment proof
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery life (150 per charge)
lack of phase detect AF
52
quiet mode (1/16,000 seconds)
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
features tracking focus
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/500 seconds)
no image stabilization
bad battery (210 per charge)
lack of phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus TG-320
Travel photography with Panasonic GX850
67
lighter than others (155 grams)
environment proof
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
bad battery life (150 per charge)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
78
comes with touch focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
screen is selfie friendly
bad battery (210 CIPA)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography highlights
Panasonic GX850 Landscape photography highlights
39
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
environment proof
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
bad battery life (150 shots)
lack of Time Lapse mode
70
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
no anti aliasing filter
great high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
no image stabilization
bad battery (210 shots)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-320 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic GX850 as a Vlogging camera
32
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focusing
lighter than others (155 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external mic support
73
screen is selfie friendly
built-in touchscreen
features face detect focus
great video quality (3840 x 2160 pixels)
no image stabilization
missing microphone support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic GX850 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic GX850
 Olympus TG-320Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX850
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus TG-320 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX850
Also called as - Lumix DMC-GX800 / Lumix DMC-GF9
Category Waterproof Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2012-01-10 2017-01-04
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III+ Venus Engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 4592 x 3448
Highest native ISO 1600 25600
Minimum native ISO 80 200
RAW images
Minimum boosted ISO - 100
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points - 49
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens focal range 28-102mm (3.6x) -
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.1 -
Macro focus range 3cm -
Available lenses - 107
Crop factor 5.8 2.1
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 2.7" 3"
Display resolution 230k dots 1,040k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/500 seconds
Maximum quiet shutter speed - 1/16000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 5.80 m 4.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 60i / 17 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 20 Mbps, MP4, H.264
Highest video resolution 1280x720 3840x2160
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155 gr (0.34 lbs) 269 gr (0.59 lbs)
Dimensions 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") 107 x 65 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 73
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.2
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.3
DXO Low light score not tested 586
Other
Battery life 150 shots 210 shots
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-42B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes (2, 10 sec, 3 images/10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC microSD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $0 $548