Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS35
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Portability
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Panasonic ZS35
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Introduced January 2014
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Older Model is Panasonic ZS30
- Refreshed by Panasonic ZS40
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS35, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the ZS35 (16MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-320 was announced 24 months prior to the ZS35 making them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the TG-320 grades against the ZS35 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Panasonic ZS35
| TG-320 | ZS35 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus TG-320
| ZS35 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | January 2012 | Fresher by 24 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic ZS35
| TG-320 | ZS35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-320 enjoys physical dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS35 has specifications of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS35 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-320 and the ZS35.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-320 and ZS35 is 94 and 89 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading through specifications. The visual here should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-320 and ZS35.
Plainly, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Panasonic ZS35 to give you more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The older TG-320 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-320 as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic ZS35 as a Portrait photography camera
resolution is good (14MP)
has face detection focus
no manual focus
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
megapixel count good (16MP)
provides face detect focusing
no manual focus
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Street photography highlights
Panasonic ZS35 Street photography highlights
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (305g)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Sports photography details
Panasonic ZS35 Sports photography details
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14MP)
has tracking autofocus
environment proofing
max frames per second low (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (150 shots)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
long zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-320 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic ZS35 as a Travel photography camera
lighter than competition in class (155g)
environment proofing
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
not so great battery pack (150 per charge)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competitors (305 grams)
megapixel count good (16MP)
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
long reach (480mm)
no Timelapse mode
does not have a selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-320
Landscape photography with Panasonic ZS35
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
environment proofing
no manual focus
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
not so great battery pack (150 per charge)
lack of Timelapse recording
relatively wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
no Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus TG-320
Vlogging with Panasonic ZS35
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focus
lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone socket
relatively wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors (305g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
does not have a selfie friendly display
no microphone socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
| Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-01-10 | 2014-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 21 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | 6.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 lb) | 305g (0.67 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $300 |