Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-r
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3ced/f3cedb69b934f7169f253825ad9ca28abd57cd22" alt="Olympus TG-320 front Olympus TG-320 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2813a/2813afe340c3e203bd6902c7b27645af6433fc86" alt="Pentax K-r front Pentax K-r front"
67 Imaging
53 Features
52 Overall
52
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-r Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 598g - 125 x 97 x 68mm
- Revealed March 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-r Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Olympus TG-320 and Pentax K-r, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the K-r (12MP) is pretty well matched but the TG-320 (1/2.3") and K-r (APS-C) enjoy different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The TG-320 was revealed 11 months later than the K-r so they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-r being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the TG-320 scores against the K-r when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-r Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-320 and Pentax K-r. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Pentax K-r Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Pentax K-r
TG-320 | K-r | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2012 | ![]() | March 2011 | More recent by 11 months |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-r over the Olympus TG-320
K-r | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Pentax K-r
TG-320 | K-r | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-r Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-320 has got external dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Pentax K-r has specifications of 125mm x 97mm x 68mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 2.7") having a weight of 598 grams (1.32 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-320 and Pentax K-r in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-320 compared to the K-r.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a863a/a863a88618cbdc2d13424e31302f8dfc63cc1ac9" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-r size comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-r size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-320 and K-r is 94 and 67 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21fea/21fea82614751c66e0edf9229d992824c8dc4a3e" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-r top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-r top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-r Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements simply by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph underneath may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-320 and K-r.
Clearly, both cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The TG-320 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field harder and the Olympus TG-320 will give you greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The newer TG-320 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98d4a/98d4aff893f43e65266ee553c7995bc68c4725e1" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-r sensor size comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-r sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-r Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fb28/8fb28a65a6884f8e0280694ca95f08c92d560ba2" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-r Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-r Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-r Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Pentax K-r | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus TG-320 | Pentax K-r |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2011-03-11 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | Prime II |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Cross focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync, High-Speed Sync and Wireless Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155g (0.34 lbs) | 598g (1.32 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 125 x 97 x 68mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.9 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 755 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 images | 470 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | D-LI109,4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $0 | $1,100 |