Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K110D
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3ced/f3cedb69b934f7169f253825ad9ca28abd57cd22" alt="Olympus TG-320 front Olympus TG-320 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b26ee/b26ee354c3adaf0307bfc7498c215c4050aaeba0" alt="Pentax K110D front Pentax K110D front"
67 Imaging
44 Features
30 Overall
38
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K110D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 585g - 129 x 93 x 70mm
- Announced May 2006
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K110D Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the Olympus TG-320 versus Pentax K110D, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and K110D (6MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and K110D (APS-C) feature different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The TG-320 was manufactured 5 years later than the K110D and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K110D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a simple summation of how the TG-320 grades vs the K110D in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K110D Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-320 and Pentax K110D. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Pentax K110D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Pentax K110D
TG-320 | K110D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2012 | ![]() | May 2006 | More recent by 69 months |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 210k | Clearer screen (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax K110D over the Olympus TG-320
K110D | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Pentax K110D
TG-320 | K110D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K110D Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-320 provides exterior dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Pentax K110D has measurements of 129mm x 93mm x 70mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-320 versus Pentax K110D in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-320 against the K110D.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64530/6453037336bc7ee9143a9c7a4733cd097f20086b" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K110D size comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K110D size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-320 and K110D is 94 and 67 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89f7e/89f7e6ea5e2420a7bf1395998b914c8eee99e56a" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K110D top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K110D top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K110D Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements simply by viewing technical specs. The visual below might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-320 and K110D.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TG-320 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF harder and the Olympus TG-320 will result in extra detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more modern TG-320 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88399/88399a913e223148da85231f626e701f7ae01a4d" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K110D sensor size comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K110D sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K110D Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e707/5e7079925eb8773b6ba95f1faee1a18114cd849b" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K110D Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K110D Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K110D Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Pentax K110D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Pentax K110D |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2006-05-22 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 6 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3008 x 2008 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lb) | 585 gr (1.29 lb) |
Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 129 x 93 x 70mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-42B | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $0 | $1,000 |