Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax E90
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
94 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax E90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-95mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 145g - 102 x 59 x 25mm
- Released January 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax E90 Overview
Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax E90, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Pentax. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and E90 (10MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-320 was revealed 24 months later than the E90 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the TG-320 grades versus the E90 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax E90 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-320 and Pentax Optio E90. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Pentax E90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Pentax E90
| TG-320 | E90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 24 months |
Reasons to pick Pentax E90 over the Olympus TG-320
| E90 | TG-320 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Pentax E90
| TG-320 | E90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax E90 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus TG-320 offers outer dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Pentax E90 has specifications of 102mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 145 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax E90 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the TG-320 versus the E90.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-320 and E90 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax E90 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizing purely by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-320 and E90.
Clearly, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You should count on the Olympus TG-320 to show more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more modern TG-320 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax E90 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax E90 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Pentax Optio E90 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus TG-320 | Pentax Optio E90 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2010-01-25 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | Prime |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 3 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 32-95mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 6cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 lb) | 145g (0.32 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 102 x 59 x 25mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-42B | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $100 |