Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
93 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 180g - 98 x 57 x 31mm
- Released June 2011
- New Model is Pentax Q10
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the Q (12MP) is relatively similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-320 was introduced 7 months later than the Q which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Pentax Q being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short overview of how the TG-320 scores versus the Q with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-320 & Pentax Q. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Pentax Q Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Pentax Q
| TG-320 | Q | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | June 2011 | Fresher by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q over the Olympus TG-320
| Q | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Pentax Q
| TG-320 | Q | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-320 has got exterior dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Pentax Q has proportions of 98mm x 57mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.2") with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at the time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-320 compared to the Q.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-320 and Q is 94 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing merely by reviewing specifications. The photograph here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-320 and Q.
Plainly, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Olympus TG-320 to deliver more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots way more aggressively. The more recent TG-320 provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Pentax Q | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus TG-320 | Pentax Q |
| Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2011-06-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 8 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 5.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Trailing-curtain sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/2000 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lb) | 180 grams (0.40 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 98 x 57 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 47 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 189 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 images | 230 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | D-LI68 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $0 | $695 |