Clicky

Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1

Portability
94
Imaging
38
Features
33
Overall
36
Olympus TG-320 front
 
Pentax Q-S1 front
Portability
92
Imaging
38
Features
54
Overall
44

Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs

Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Introduced January 2012
Pentax Q-S1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Pentax Q Mount
  • 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
  • Announced August 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview

Here, we will be matching up the Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the Q-S1 (12MP) is relatively comparable but the TG-320 (1/2.3") and Q-S1 (1/1.7") boast different sensor dimensions.

Photography Glossary

The TG-320 was brought out 3 years earlier than the Q-S1 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the TG-320 matches up against the Q-S1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Pentax Q-S1

 TG-320 Q-S1 

Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Olympus TG-320

 Q-S1 TG-320 
AnnouncedAugust 2014January 2012More modern by 31 months
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Pentax Q-S1

 TG-320 Q-S1 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither provides Touch friendly screen

Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-320 provides physical measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Pentax Q-S1 has dimensions of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).

Look at the Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the TG-320 and the Q-S1.

Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-320 and Q-S1 is 94 and 92 respectively.

Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizes just by checking out specs. The pic here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-320 and Q-S1.

All in all, both of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-320 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Olympus TG-320 will produce more detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged TG-320 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography details
Pentax Q-S1 Portrait photography details
34
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
supports face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
46
focusing manually
includes face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Street photography factors
Pentax Q-S1 Street photography factors
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
lighter than average (155g)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
69
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
delivers RAW files
lighter than competition (203g)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Sports photography advice
Pentax Q-S1 Sports photography advice
41
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
weather proofing
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
low battery life (150 CIPA)
no phase detect auto focus
37
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes tracking focus
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
not so great battery life (250 shots)
has no phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-320 as a Travel photography camera
Pentax Q-S1 as a Travel photography camera
67
lighter than average (155 grams)
weather proofing
resolution is good (14MP)
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
low battery life (150 shots)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
60
lighter than competition (203g)
has built in flash
not so great battery life (250 CIPA)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus TG-320
Landscape photography with Pentax Q-S1
39
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14MP)
weather proofing
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
lack of manual mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
low battery life (150 CIPA)
does not have Time Lapse mode
55
focusing manually
change lenses (Pentax Q mount)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
delivers RAW files
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
not so great battery life (250 per charge)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Vlogging features
Pentax Q-S1 Vlogging features
32
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
lighter than average (155g)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external mic support
35
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (203g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of mic jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-320 and Pentax Q-S1
 Olympus TG-320Pentax Q-S1
General Information
Make Olympus Pentax
Model Olympus TG-320 Pentax Q-S1
Category Waterproof Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2012-01-10 2014-08-04
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III+ Q Engine
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4288 x 3216 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 1600 12800
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Pentax Q
Lens focal range 28-102mm (3.6x) -
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.1 -
Macro focus range 3cm -
Total lenses - 8
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/8000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 1.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 5.80 m 4.90 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155 grams (0.34 lbs) 203 grams (0.45 lbs)
Physical dimensions 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 150 pictures 250 pictures
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-42B D-LI68
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $0 $250