Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3ced/f3cedb69b934f7169f253825ad9ca28abd57cd22" alt="Olympus TG-320 front Olympus TG-320 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd627/dd6277e99ef9f564cea30d5ecbfa8cecd5214610" alt="Pentax Q-S1 front Pentax Q-S1 front"
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Announced August 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the Q-S1 (12MP) is relatively comparable but the TG-320 (1/2.3") and Q-S1 (1/1.7") boast different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The TG-320 was brought out 3 years earlier than the Q-S1 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the TG-320 matches up against the Q-S1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-320 and Pentax Q-S1. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Pentax Q-S1
TG-320 | Q-S1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Olympus TG-320
Q-S1 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2014 | ![]() | January 2012 | More modern by 31 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Pentax Q-S1
TG-320 | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-320 provides physical measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Pentax Q-S1 has dimensions of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the TG-320 and the Q-S1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd90c/dd90c5eb5464d8d4699ea62733013ca8de87b5fc" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-320 and Q-S1 is 94 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4818/f48188eba72f81469e7dd380b2fe7e7884bdf28f" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizes just by checking out specs. The pic here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-320 and Q-S1.
All in all, both of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-320 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Olympus TG-320 will produce more detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged TG-320 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddbf7/ddbf78c2fa9b8a8791e690a46e70eb103bcc3228" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eeb94/eeb94d8e2f10bd7a5b30c527556ec57bd9867720" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Pentax Q-S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus TG-320 | Pentax Q-S1 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2014-08-04 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | Q Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 8 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) | 203 grams (0.45 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 pictures | 250 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $0 | $250 |