Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh CX1
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Here is a extended assessment of the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh CX1, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and CX1 (9MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-320 was unveiled 2 years later than the CX1 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple view of how the TG-320 grades vs the CX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh CX1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Ricoh CX1
| TG-320 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 36 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus TG-320
| CX1 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh CX1
| TG-320 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-320 has external measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX1 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh CX1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the TG-320 vs the CX1.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and CX1 is 94 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizing simply by checking out technical specs. The visual underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-320 and CX1.
As you have seen, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Olympus TG-320 to produce greater detail having an extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more recent TG-320 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh CX1 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2009-02-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) | 180 gr (0.40 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $0 | $299 |