Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh CX4
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Portability
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Ricoh CX4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh CX4, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and CX4 (10MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-320 was launched 17 months after the CX4 making them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the TG-320 scores against the CX4 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-320 & Ricoh CX4. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Ricoh CX4
| TG-320 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | August 2010 | More modern by 17 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Olympus TG-320
| CX4 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh CX4
| TG-320 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-320 has outer measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX4 has sizing of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh CX4 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-320 versus the CX4.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-320 and CX4 is 94 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes only by going through technical specs. The pic here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-320 and CX4.
As you have seen, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-320 to show extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics way more aggressively. The younger TG-320 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-320
Portrait photography with Ricoh CX4
MP count decent (14MP)
has face detection autofocus
no manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
you can focus manually
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Street photography information
Ricoh CX4 Street photography information
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
lighter than others (155g)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (205g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Olympus TG-320 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh CX4 as a Sports photography camera
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
weather proofing
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
low battery (150 shots)
does not have phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow fps (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography info
Ricoh CX4 Travel photography info
lighter than others (155g)
weather proofing
MP count decent (14MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
low battery (150 shots)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competitors in class (205g)
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
long zoom (300mm)
low megapixels (10MP)
does not contain selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography factors
Ricoh CX4 Landscape photography factors
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
weather proofing
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
no manual mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
low battery (150 CIPA)
does not have Time Lapse function
you can focus manually
fairly wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual exposure
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus TG-320
Vlogging with Ricoh CX4
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection autofocus
lighter than others (155g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic socket
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (205 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not contain selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external microphone jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh CX4 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-01-10 | 2010-08-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-42B | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $0 | $211 |