Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh G700SE
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
88 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh G700SE Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 307g - 117 x 68 x 32mm
- Launched October 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh G700SE Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh G700SE, both Waterproof digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the G700SE (12MP) is fairly similar and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-320 was launched 16 months later than the G700SE making them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the TG-320 scores against the G700SE when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh G700SE Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-320 & Ricoh G700SE. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Ricoh G700SE Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Ricoh G700SE
| TG-320 | G700SE | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | October 2010 | More recent by 16 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh G700SE over the Olympus TG-320
| G700SE | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh G700SE
| TG-320 | G700SE | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh G700SE Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-320 has outside measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh G700SE has measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 32mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.3") along with a weight of 307 grams (0.68 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh G700SE in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the TG-320 and the G700SE.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-320 and G700SE is 94 and 88 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh G700SE Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor measurements purely by going over technical specs. The photograph below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-320 and G700SE.
As you can tell, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-320 to offer more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The younger TG-320 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh G700SE Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh G700SE Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh G700SE | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh G700SE |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2010-10-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Auto red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) | 307 grams (0.68 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 117 x 68 x 32mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | DB-60 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $0 | $0 |