Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh G900
Portability
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
Portability
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
Ricoh G900
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Released February 2018
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh G900 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus TG-320 versus Ricoh G900, both Waterproof cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and G900 (20MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-320 was brought out 7 years before the G900 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the TG-320 scores vs the G900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-320 & Ricoh G900. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Ricoh G900
| TG-320 | G900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Olympus TG-320
| G900 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2018 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 74 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh G900
| TG-320 | G900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-320 has got physical dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Ricoh G900 has measurements of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-320 versus Ricoh G900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-320 versus the G900.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-320 and G900 is 94 and 89 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements simply by going through technical specs. The visual below will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-320 and G900.
As you have seen, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh G900 to produce extra detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older TG-320 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography features
Ricoh G900 Portrait photography features
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
features face detection autofocus
no manual focus
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
has manual focus
good MP (20MP)
supports face detect focusing
no manual exposure
no external flash support
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Street photography with Olympus TG-320
Street photography with Ricoh G900
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
lighter than competitors in class (155g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
has image stabilization (Digital)
weather proofing
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
heavier than competitors in class (247g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Olympus TG-320 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh G900 as a Sports photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
features tracking autofocus
weather proofing
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery (150 per charge)
lacks phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Digital)
good MP (20 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
weather proofing
good battery pack (340 shots)
no shutter priority
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus TG-320
Travel photography with Ricoh G900
lighter than competitors in class (155g)
weather proofing
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
no Timelapse mode
not so great battery (150 shots)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
good battery pack (340 per charge)
weather proofing
good MP (20 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
heavier than competitors in class (247g)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography factors
Ricoh G900 Landscape photography factors
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
weather proofing
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7")
manual mode not available
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
not so great battery (150 CIPA)
no Timelapse mode
has manual focus
relatively wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Digital)
good MP (20MP)
weather proofing
good battery pack (340 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
no manual exposure
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-320 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh G900 as a Vlogging camera
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection autofocus
lighter than competitors in class (155 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external microphone jack
relatively wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
supports face detect focusing
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have mic jack
heavier than competitors in class (247 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh G900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh G900 |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2018-02-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Flash on, flash off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 photos | 340 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $752 |
