Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GR II
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
89 Imaging
58 Features
55 Overall
56
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Launched June 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GR II Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh GR II, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the GR II (16MP) is pretty comparable but the TG-320 (1/2.3") and GR II (APS-C) feature totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-320 was revealed 4 years before the GR II which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the TG-320 grades against the GR II with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GR II Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-320 & Ricoh GR II. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Ricoh GR II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Ricoh GR II
| TG-320 | GR II |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Olympus TG-320
| GR II | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2015 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 41 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh GR II
| TG-320 | GR II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-320 enjoys physical measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR II has sizing of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh GR II in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the TG-320 against the GR II.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-320 and GR II is 94 and 89 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes simply by checking out a spec sheet. The image underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-320 and GR II.
As you can see, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-320 using its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh tougher and the Ricoh GR II will provide more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged TG-320 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GR II Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh GR II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh GR II |
| Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2015-06-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | GR Engine V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-16.0 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 300 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lb) | 251 gr (0.55 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 80 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.7 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1078 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 shots | 320 shots |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $0 | $599 |